Press release
March 6, 2025 Pasay City, Philippines – The National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms, Inc. (NASECORE), represented by its National President, Petronilo L. Ilagan, has filed an omnibus motion questioning the Energy Regulatory Commission’s (ERC) acquisition of jurisdiction over Manila Electric Company’s (Meralco) rate application. The motion also challenges the status of two lawyers representing themselves as consumer intervenors.
Jurisdictional Challenge. During the February 28, 2025, hearing on Meralco’s application for confirmation of the actual weighted average tariff (AWAT) from July 2022 to December 2024, NASECORE raised concerns about the lack of compliance with a key requirement of the implementing rules of Republic Act 9136 (EPIRA). This provision mandates that any rate adjustment application must include an acknowledgment of receipt from the Local Government Unit (LGU) Legislative Body in the applicant’s area of operation, along with proof of newspaper publication. NASECORE argues that without this, the ERC cannot acquire valid jurisdiction over the case, making all proceedings and orders null and void.
Alleged “Nuisance” Intervenors
NASECORE also questioned the participation of two lawyers, Atty. Paris Real and Atty. Andres Manuel, who have intervened in previous Meralco applications under the guise of consumer representation. The group alleges that these lawyers, despite claiming to act in the interest of consumers, have consistently taken positions aligned with Meralco. NASECORE cited past cases where these lawyers opposed the organization’s motions and challenged its legitimacy as a consumer advocate. The motion raises concerns that they may be acting as de facto representatives of Meralco, undermining consumer protection efforts. NASECORE urges the ERC to investigate their affiliations and determine whether they should be disqualified from further participation.
Relief Sought
In its motion, NASECORE requests that the ERC:
1. Direct Meralco to provide each LGU Legislative Body in its franchise area with a copy of the application and submit stamped acknowledgment receipts within seven days.
2. Penalize Meralco for non-compliance and recommend the revocation of its franchise if necessary.
3. Investigate the real motives and affiliations of the two questioned lawyers.
4. Take appropriate action, including possible disqualification of the lawyers and referral to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) or the Supreme Court for ethical investigation. NASECORE emphasizes that its advocacy for electricity consumers has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court in landmark rulings that ensured refunds and rate reductions. The organization remains committed to transparency, accountability, and fair treatment for all electricity consumers.
For further information, please contact: National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms, Inc.